From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: strange byte compiler behavior Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:11:34 -0800 Message-ID: <200712312211.lBVMBYgL017584@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200712312055.lBVKteSa012881@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <47796135.8040900@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199139161 27537 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2007 22:12:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 31 23:12:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J9SsN-0003ds-Pp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:12:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9Ss1-0003Ou-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9Sry-0003Ng-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J9Srx-0003LO-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J9Srw-0003L0-Sy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J9Srw-0008P9-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:12:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lBVMBYgL017584; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:11:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <47796135.8040900@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:37:57 +0100") Original-Lines: 20 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85767 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > There's still the occurrence of `file' in `vc-next-action' I reported in > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-12/msg00872.html > > ((stringp state) > (let ((revision > (if verbose > (read-string "Revision to steal: ") > (vc-working-revision file)))) > ^^^^ > (dolist (file files) (vc-steal-lock file revision state)))) Interesting. No warning is ever issued for this one, and an incorrect one is issued for another occurrence of `file' in that file in interactive mode. [I think is better to refrain from fixing the code until the byte compiler issues are analyzed].