From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?q?R=F6hler?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: comment-beginning Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <200711181758.27614.andreas.roehler@online.de> References: <200711181634.58741.andreas.roehler@online.de> <87lk8v8smf.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195405084 23567 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2007 16:58:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 16:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sven Joachim To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 18 17:58:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ItnTF-0002vo-7O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:58:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItnT2-00031V-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItnSx-00031M-W9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ItnSw-000312-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ItnSw-00030z-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ItnSv-00079j-OI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 11:57:50 -0500 Original-Received: from noname (p54BEABF7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.190.171.247]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML21M-1ItnSu43NL-0001zM; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 17:57:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 In-Reply-To: <87lk8v8smf.fsf@gmx.de> Content-Disposition: inline X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/xD/Qx1q9XAlvMt7BCHmpoOlADJko9n7cqFXj yqnTir1yD9TeCP7E0xe54qr0LjzrscmXTeXsFkhBr4kAk0cpaU v6j/kSedNG1Eews6sFElQ== X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83544 Archived-At: Am Sonntag, 18. November 2007 16:45 schrieb Sven Joachim: > Andreas R=F6hler writes: > > C-h f comment-beginning fails > > > > with message: [no match] > > > > whereas comment-beginning is present in newcomment.el > > > > in contrast > > C-h f comment-dwim displays documentation as expected. > > > > Can't see a reason. > > The reason is that comment-dwim is autoloaded, while comment-beginning > is not. And that's probably reasonable, given that comment-beginning > is not interactive. > > Hmm, thanks. Thought to call it from a program... It works, if newcomment.el is explicitly loaded (again). Which doesn't look clever OTOH. Andreas R=F6hler