From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: desupporting X10 and old X11 releases (was: Re: isearch multiple buffers) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:45:14 -0700 Message-ID: <200710281645.l9SGjEO7024789@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <87odfcggvl.fsf@jurta.org> <87hckk9uoa.fsf@jurta.org> <87abqcrq9p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <471BE5D3.3050007@gmail.com> <87y7dwq7x9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odepv21n.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ir4wjcev.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <200710261516.l9QFGQ7C001069@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710261941.l9QJfcH0010503@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710271728.l9RHSk8B019811@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193590034 26622 80.91.229.12 (28 Oct 2007 16:47:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 16:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 28 17:47:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ImBI6-0000Ew-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 17:47:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImBHx-0000xl-0i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:47:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImBGr-0008IS-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ImBGo-0008Em-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:45:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ImBGo-0008EN-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:45:50 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ImBGf-0000C6-Mt; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l9SGjEO7024789; Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:45:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun\, 28 Oct 2007 09\:50\:22 -0400") Original-Lines: 30 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81974 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > X10 (window-system-version mentions it, is it still supported?) > > I think all code specific to X10 was all deleted ages ago. There's still a bit of code in the s/* m/* files and Makefile.in that deals with LIBX10_SYSTEM and LIBX10_MACHINE. Hopefully most of it will disappear after we desupport some platforms. But there's also oldXMenu/X10.h. Is that still relevant? Is oldXMenu still used? > There are a few conditionals that test HAVE_X11, but they really > use it to test whether X is present at all. > > There are still conditionals for X11R3 (testing HAVE_X11R4). That > must be long obsolete. We can delete them if that would save us any > trouble. It will allow us to get rid of some code in xterm.[ch] and xfns.c, so it seems worth doing. How about X11R4, is that still worth supporting? > Your list of platforms to propose to delete seems like a good start. > Please collect others' suggestions, then post the final list in a few > days. Sounds good.