From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: keypad-*-setup Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:16:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20070918041606.GA7244@www.trapp.net> References: <87wsupq77a.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190089073 28164 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2007 04:17:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 18 06:17:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXUWx-0002Dc-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 06:17:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXUWw-0002gy-AT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:17:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXUWs-0002gj-IR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:17:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXUWq-0002gX-QQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:17:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXUWq-0002gU-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104] helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IXUWq-0002V2-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from www.elogos.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.elogos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAA24B615; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 4000) id E89354B617; Tue, 18 Sep 2007 04:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wsupq77a.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79170 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:04:57AM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote: > "Drew Adams" writes: [...] > > 2. Do we really need a separate `numeric' choice? Why not always spec= ify an > > explicit decimal-point? [...] > IIRC, the intention was to _somehow_ find the proper decimal point > character from the language/regional environment settings. FWIW: A quick apropos didn't reveal to me anything. A first rough try would be to use the output of "locale -c decimal_point", which I'd expect to work on modern GNU libc based systems. Regards - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFG71EGBcgs9XrR2kYRArhaAJ9oGnlae/nMmpT50X0+MXRba1gdyACfU0p+ N5eZAlCWykQkDVcT8I4rJN8=3D =3D+zo3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----