From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; frozen frame after C-x 5 0 Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:00:26 -0700 Message-ID: <200709121800.l8CI0QgQ014557@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <87abs0mfxy.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <87lkbblxtd.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> <200709121545.l8CFjESt007173@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <87tzpzkghi.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189620252 10048 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2007 18:04:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 18:04:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 20:04:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVWZE-0004C4-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:04:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVWZD-0000wZ-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVWZA-0000vF-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVWZ9-0000v3-9t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVWZ9-0000v0-7W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVWZ8-0002vz-QT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:54 -0400 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVWYj-00036y-8g for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVWZ5-0002vA-1I for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:54 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVWYu-0002tH-Tk; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l8CI0QgQ014557; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87tzpzkghi.fsf@baldur.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed\, 12 Sep 2007 18\:15\:05 +0200") Original-Lines: 41 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.363, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, TW_GT 0.08) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78698 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:19862 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > Dan Nicolaescu writes: > > Hi Dan, > > > > First, here's a simpler command line to reproduce my problem: > > > > > > emacs -nw -f server-start > > > > Can you please first try this with "emacs -q -nw -f server-start" ? > > Yes, it doesn't make a difference and -Q doesn't, too. Here's what I > did: > > 1. Start the server within gdb > > $ gdb /usr/bin/emacs > (gdb) run -q -nw -f server-start > > 2. Connect with a X11 client > > $ emacsclient > > 3. Close the frame with > > C-x 5 0 > > it doesn't vanish but it won't be repainted anymore. > I can reproduce this with an emacs build with gtk (version gtk2-2.8.20) but not with emacs build with the Lucid toolkit (my default build). In the Lucid build the frame is deleted when stepping over this call: (*terminal->delete_terminal_hook) (terminal); So my guess is that the Gtk version of x_delete_terminal does not do the right thing...