From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Christensen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 21.1.50; [Gnus] Broken characters in iso-8859-15 formatted emails Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:26:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20070910072629.GA12677@foobar> References: <20070907142018.E409595451@foobar.localdomain> <87ps0uj7g7.fsf@foobar.localdomain> <871wd9ebxv.fsf@foobar.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189411379 29446 80.91.229.12 (10 Sep 2007 08:02:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 10 18:02:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IUlAk-0005Rg-Tf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:27:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUdgM-0002ha-1S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUdgH-0002g3-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IUdgF-0002e3-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IUdgF-0002du-JP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUdgF-0006A3-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUdfs-00088I-OR for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUdgA-00069L-W2 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [91.189.201.79] (helo=thomasc.openhost.dk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IUdgA-000691-N4 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:27:30 -0400 Original-Received: from foobar.localdomain (unknown [80.72.152.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thomasc.openhost.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270E129C842D; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:27:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by foobar.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E79B94C99; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:26:28 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78419 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:19813 Archived-At: On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 11:41:06AM +0900, Kenichi Handa wrote: > In article <871wd9ebxv.fsf@foobar.localdomain>, Thomas Christensen writes: > > > I must apologize for the noise. It appears to be that Gentoo is > > hardcoded to only generate iso-8859-1 fonts in modular X. > > Does it mean that the problem was solved by installing > iso-8859-15 fonts? Yes, it solved the problem completely. I puzzles me a bit though, that Emacs is the only application that could not handle the iso-8859-15 without these fonts, and also how the others applications *did* handle this. But I know little of these matters. Thomas