From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; log-view-current-file error Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:29:47 -0700 Message-ID: <200709060529.l865TlwZ001094@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200709042352.l84NquKN011978@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189056895 30528 80.91.229.10 (6 Sep 2007 05:34:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 07:40:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITA63-0008SN-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITA0v-0000dt-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:34:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9xg-0006YR-OF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:31:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9xf-0006Xl-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9xf-0006XZ-4l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:31:27 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT9xe-0002vn-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:31:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l865TlwZ001094; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 22:29:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Thu\, 06 Sep 2007 00\:07\:40 +0100") Original-Lines: 41 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77940 Archived-At: Leo writes: > On 2007-09-05 00:52 +0100, Dan Nicolaescu wrote: > > Leo writes: > > > > > On 2007-09-02 04:09 +0100, Glenn Morris wrote: > > > > Actually as of a little while ago you see a different error. :) > > > > > > > > This was reported before. It's caused by ESR's VC changes. It's > > > > trivial to modify the regexp to match the new format (which now says > > > > "file(s)"), but less trivial to make it actually do the right thing if > > > > there are multiple files there (perhaps there can't be at present, I > > > > don't know). > > > > > > I am glad that you are aware of this bug ;) > > > > > > I learned from Mwolson that dvc is soon to be merged into Emacs, > > > > Was that change approved or at least discussed anywere? > > There has no discussion in eamcs-devel yet. But I learned it from him in > #emacs irc. > > > > > > which > > > means Emacs will have vc to deal with file-based version control and dvc > > > to handle distributed version control. > > > > Can you please explain what do you mean by that? > > Maybe someone else can explain this better. My feeling is that it is > only suitable for committing changes that are made within a single > file. That is not the case anymore, VC can perform operations on multiple file (the bug that started this thread is a consequence of adding that feature). > DVC is superior in design. It would be interesting to find out more about that...