From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: status of dir-vars or dir-locals inclusion in emacs? Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:32:11 -0700 Message-ID: <200709051732.l85HWNUp007863@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200709042153.l84LrdvU008320@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189013838 13008 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 17:37:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 17:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, rms@gnu.org, joakim@verona.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 19:37:18 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISyoU-0008MC-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:37:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISyoR-0007Hf-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISyoO-0007HZ-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISyoK-0007Gt-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISyoK-0007Go-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISyoH-0001S0-EK; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:37:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l85HWNUp007863; Wed, 5 Sep 2007 10:32:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue\, 04 Sep 2007 23\:16\:46 -0400") Original-Lines: 14 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77876 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > Can we please reduce the number of the files that are looked up from 3 > > to 2? > > Do we need both .emacs-settings.el and .emacs-settings? IMHO one of > > them should be enough. > > Even just one seems to be plenty. > Either .emacs-settings or .emacs-settings.el (no preference between the > two). The reason I thought about 2 was so that we can have a .emacs-settings file and another one that does not start with a dot for filesystems/OSes that have issues with files that start with a dot.