From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: regression in C-x v = in latest versions Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 10:46:49 -0700 Message-ID: <200709021746.l82Hksot018381@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <200708191705.57599.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <200708232340.30025.pogonyshev@gmx.net> <877inhafkg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188755370 11897 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2007 17:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 17:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, esr@snark.thyrsus.com, Chong Yidong , pogonyshev@gmx.net, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 02 19:49:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IRtZc-0003Ti-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:49:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtZb-0005xF-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:49:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtZY-0005vT-3I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtZT-0005vH-VK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRtZT-0005vE-Q9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRtZM-0002ol-1z; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l82Hksot018381; Sun, 2 Sep 2007 10:46:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 27 Aug 2007 14\:18\:32 -0400") Original-Lines: 16 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-0.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, FS_SINGLE_LETTER 1.00) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77607 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > The need for a valid change log for the change that was already > > installed is a permanent need. Even if he can't do the rest of the > > redesign he planned, we still need a proper change log for what was > > installed (unless we take it out). > > The alternative, of course, is to revert to the last working version. > If and when, ESR finishes this redesign, it can be checked back in. > > If we need to revert because of problems in the code, then we will. > But I think that isn't necessary -- there are not so many bugs. > I don't want to revert the code merely because of the lack of ChangeLog > data. It would be better for someone simply to write that. I rewrote the ChangeLog entry. I hope this helps.