From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Ridolfi Subject: Re: Re: GPL3 (was: Org-mode version 5.05) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:01:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20070823120132.GA4481@fastwebnet.it> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOBKQ-0000fq-FP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:58:22 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IOBKP-0000fS-0q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:58:22 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IOBKO-0000fP-Pm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:58:20 -0400 Received: from aa014msr.fastwebnet.it ([85.18.95.74]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IOBKO-0006G8-4I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:58:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (37.254.28.138) by aa014msr.fastwebnet.it (7.3.118.6) id 466579D60396C186 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:58:16 +0200 Received: from giovanni by localhost with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IOBNU-0001b4-Co for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:01:32 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > On Aug 22, 2007, at 15:20, Leo wrote: > >>> I am releasing version 5.05 of Org-mode. As usual, it is in the Emacs >>> CVS trunk, and at my website >> >> Emacs CVS trunk is licensed to GPL3. However org is licensed >> GPL2. Should we change to GPL3 also? >> Well, org-mode , org-export-latex, org-mouse, org-publish, org-card.tex are licenced under "GPL2 or any later version" : ;; This file is part of GNU Emacs. ;; ;; GNU Emacs is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify ;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by ;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option) ;; any later version. so, we can "use" org-mode also with GPL3. However thank you, Leo, for pointing this out. On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:18:16PM +0200, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I have not really followed that discussion. Do you have a good pointer > for a discussion of the pros and cons? RMS suggest to switch to "GPL3 or any later", because GPL3 offers a wider protection for our freedoms. Please, have a look at the site http://www.gnu.org and search for "presentation of GPL3" or FAQ or something like that, sorry if I can't provide a link. Cheers, Giovanni