From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tomas@tuxteam.de Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display.texi: (,) isn't documented. Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:23:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20070607082335.GB7218@www.trapp.net> References: <20070605231947.GA2058@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181205184 10562 80.91.229.12 (7 Jun 2007 08:33:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 07 10:33:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HwDQT-00075Y-VU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:33:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwDQS-0003wz-PI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:33:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HwDPi-0003IG-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:32:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HwDPg-0003Ga-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwDPg-0003G7-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from alextrapp1.equinoxe.de ([217.22.192.104] helo=www.elogos.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HwDPe-0000Nc-Al for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 04:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from www.elogos.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.elogos.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE0B4B5B8; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by www.elogos.de (Postfix, from userid 4000) id 1968A4B60B; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070605231947.GA2058@muc.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72406 Archived-At: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:19:47AM +0100, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > Hi, Emacs! >=20 > When one of line-number-mode and column-number-mode is enabled, you see > either "L561" or "C2" in the mode line. When both are enabled, you see > instead "(561,2)". This isn't documented in the Emacs manual page > "Optional Mode Line". One definitive disadvantage of the "Lnnn Cnnn" format (and of the separate "Lnnn" or "Cnnn" formats in use now) is that they are not very internatinalization-friendly: they'll work only in English and some Latin-based languages. Of course, Emacs isn't i18n-ready, by a far stretch, but if we want to have that some day, maybe now is the time to consider such things when designing new features -- wdyt?=20 Regards - -- tom=C3=A1s -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGZ8CHBcgs9XrR2kYRAiOUAJ9dGAAOvPqEVYkihuBItMdQESVjOwCeORxh r+ZvymMbs0Um5sfHJBSeleo=3D =3DAh+l -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----