From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: new Emacs maintainer(s)? (was: Re: Post-22.1 development?) Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:53:17 -0700 Message-ID: <200706041853.l54IrLXb006451@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1180983340 29359 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2007 18:55:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 18:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 04 20:55:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HvHiM-00010n-MS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 20:55:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvHiM-00067h-6X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:55:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvHiI-00067S-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvHiI-00067D-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:55:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvHiH-00067A-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvHiD-000796-MS; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:55:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l54IrLXb006451; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 11:53:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 04 Jun 2007 12\:44\:09 -0400") Original-Lines: 19 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72219 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > As for the trunk, should we begin merging the unicode branch in? > > Let's wait a couple of months. I think it will be easier to move some > changes selectively to the Emacs 22 branch if we have not included > unicode-2 in the trunk. As of now, any change in the trunk would work > in the branch. After unicode-2 is installed, many changes will be > done differently, and they won't work unchanged in the Emacs 22 branch. Do you still plan to turn over Emacs maintenance to someone else? Have you made a decision on who is going to be the new Emacs maintainer(s)? If that is still the plan, maybe is better to ask the future maintainers to formulate the development plan to better suit their development strategy.