From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Werner LEMBERG Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr: Locale Dependent Downcasing in smtpmail] Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:24:05 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <20070406.112405.223252076.wl@gnu.org> References: <20070406.084909.48807006.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175851623 32348 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2007 09:27:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 09:27:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: simon@josefsson.org, yazicivo@ttnet.net.tr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org To: eliz@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 11:26:39 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZkgE-0005Ii-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:24:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZkjh-0002kg-4i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZkjd-0002it-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HZkjb-0002f2-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:27:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HZkjb-0002el-SC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HZkg7-0001wA-2G; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 05:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.143.170.51] (helo=localhost) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML31I-1HZkg31r08-00060j; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 11:24:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.50 on Emacs 22.0.95.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18fIwOBPlMcaHQr7VLD5vKqlIbEw3SSgR6O4k/ zykaz5HrmqeE2MrGzMjIjkdPYd+W5jzcFXDal3t0ylf8xLIZH+ L3NbIEdBtXxbmFGc9c27A== X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6? (barebone, rare!) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69120 Archived-At: > > > Ideally, searching `ma=DFe' should not match `masse', but it shou= ld > > > match `MASSE'. > = > Are we talking about Emacs 22 or Emacs 23? If the former, I don't > think we should do anything with such complicated case equivalences, > at least not now. Yep. > If you are talking about Emacs 23, I think we should first try to > design its search routines to cater to all the complications describe= d > by the Unicode standard, no matter how difficult that is. Only if > full compliance turns out to be unbearably hard and slow, should we > consider less strict adherence. Hmm. The `Ma=DFe' vs. `Masse' issue is very special. I doubt that thi= s is covered by any Unicode Technical Report. Additionally, it's a matter of taste. Werner