Re: [debian-vrms] Bug#221807: "please take this into consideration"

[David Diaz <david@leals.com>]

Bdale Garbee wrote:
> David Diaz wrote:
> > I personally think too if the package name is "Virtual RMS" it should
> > abide the RMS principles, just to avoid confusion to the package's users.
>
> I understand your point.  I guess I just still hold out hope that the
> FSF may one day again publish documentation under a license that's
> compliant with the DFSG...

The facts are that a "Virtual RMS" is a RMS not a DFSG. Please, rename the 
package. Do not confuse the users of your package.


> > Note the comment in the vrms description package:

> I'm completely aware that vrms has never really fulfilled the original
> vision I/we had for it... 

> Do you care about this enough to want to help work on vrms?

I am overloaded with this www.gnuherds.org

Best regards,
Davi