Run Shell Command on Buffer

Run Shell Command on Buffer

[super-nub]

Hi!

1) Is it possible to run `shell-command' <some command> <RET> on the current
buffer? Or is there a shortcut to the file name of the current buffer, so
that I would type e.g. `ls -l %' as a command and % is replaced by the name
of the current file?

2) `fit-window-to-buffer' is cool :) Is it possible to fit another than the
currently active window to its buffer without switching to it?

Thx!
super-nub
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Run-Shell-Command-on-Buffer-tf3084566.html#a8572445
Sent from the Emacs - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Peter Dyballa]

Am 24.01.2007 um 22:02 schrieb super-nub:

> 1) Is it possible to run `shell-command' <some command> <RET> on  
> the current
> buffer? Or is there a shortcut to the file name of the current  
> buffer, so
> that I would type e.g. `ls -l %' as a command and % is replaced by  
> the name
> of the current file?

Have you checked shell-command-on-region?

What do you want to achieve?

--
Greetings

   Pete

’Twas a woman who drove me to drink, and I never had the courtesy
  to thank her for it.         — W.C. Fields

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Marc Tfardy]

super-nub wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> is there a shortcut to the file name of the current buffer

(buffer-file-name) ;; function

or

buffer-file-name  ;; variable


regards

Marc

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[super-nub]

Hi Pete,

for example I want to execute `grep' on my buffer/file to get a survey of the section headings in my document (that I keep in a special format for this purpose), e.g.:

$ egrep '^\s*-[[:upper:]]+' myfile
$ -INTRODUCTION
$     -BLA BLA
$     -BLA 2
$ -MAIN PART
$     -MISCELLANEOUS
$         -ETC BLA BLA

shell-command-on-region turned out to be a bit impractical, because I lose my current position in the document, as the cursor jumps to the beginning when running shell-command-on-region. I guess I would have to write a LISP macro to fix that...!?

Regards,
super-nub

On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 10:24:30PM +0100, Peter Dyballa wrote:
> 
> Am 24.01.2007 um 22:02 schrieb super-nub:
> 
> >1) Is it possible to run `shell-command' <some command> <RET> on  
> >the current
> >buffer? Or is there a shortcut to the file name of the current  
> >buffer, so
> >that I would type e.g. `ls -l %' as a command and % is replaced by  
> >the name
> >of the current file?
> 
> Have you checked shell-command-on-region?
> 
> What do you want to achieve?
> 
> --
> Greetings
> 
>   Pete
> 
> ’Twas a woman who drove me to drink, and I never had the courtesy
>  to thank her for it.         — W.C. Fields
> 
> 

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[scame]

That looks promising... is it possible to use the variable "inside"
shell-command? I'm thinking of something like

M-x shell-command <RET>
grep 'bla' $buffer-file-name

Thx,
super-nub

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 22:58:57 +0100, "Marc Tfardy" <m-t-o@web.de> said:
> super-nub wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > is there a shortcut to the file name of the current buffer
> 
> (buffer-file-name) ;; function
> 
> or
> 
> buffer-file-name  ;; variable
> 
> 
> regards
> 
> Marc
> 
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Barry Margolin]

In article <mailman.3545.1169683280.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
 super-nub <scame@fastmail.fm> wrote:

> Hi Pete,
> 
> for example I want to execute `grep' on my buffer/file to get a survey of the 
> section headings in my document (that I keep in a special format for this 
> purpose), e.g.:
> 
> $ egrep '^\s*-[[:upper:]]+' myfile
> $ -INTRODUCTION
> $     -BLA BLA
> $     -BLA 2
> $ -MAIN PART
> $     -MISCELLANEOUS
> $         -ETC BLA BLA
> 
> shell-command-on-region turned out to be a bit impractical, because I lose my 
> current position in the document, as the cursor jumps to the beginning when 
> running shell-command-on-region. I guess I would have to write a LISP macro 
> to fix that...!?

The mark-whole-buffer command (C-x h) pushes a mark at the original 
location.  So after you run shell-command-on-region, you can use C-u 
C-space C-u C-space to get back to where you were.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[reader]

super-nub <scame@fastmail.fm> writes:

> Hi Pete,
>
> for example I want to execute `grep' on my buffer/file to get a
> survey of the section headings in my document (that I keep in a
> special format for this purpose), e.g.:
>
> $ egrep '^\s*-[[:upper:]]+' myfile
> $ -INTRODUCTION
> $     -BLA BLA
> $     -BLA 2
> $ -MAIN PART
> $     -MISCELLANEOUS
> $         -ETC BLA BLA

It looks like `M-x occur' may be what you want.  It will display all the
hits in a separate buffer.

Another nifty aspect is that you can use the hits provided as links to
jump to them in the parent buffer.

If I understood your usage M-x occur will be just the ticket.

If you like this tool... type M-x occur<spc><spc> to see other
formulations of using it.

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[scame]

Wow, "occur" totally RULES! That's even more than I wanted to achieve!
:) Thanks!
The problem how to run an arbitrary shell command on the current file --
be it via the text in the buffer or via the filename -- remains. Any
ideas on that?

On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:32:16 -0500, "Barry Margolin"
<barmar@alum.mit.edu> said:
> In article <mailman.3545.1169683280.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
>  super-nub <scame@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Pete,
> > 
> > for example I want to execute `grep' on my buffer/file to get a survey of the 
> > section headings in my document (that I keep in a special format for this 
> > purpose), e.g.:
> > 
> > $ egrep '^\s*-[[:upper:]]+' myfile
> > $ -INTRODUCTION
> > $     -BLA BLA
> > $     -BLA 2
> > $ -MAIN PART
> > $     -MISCELLANEOUS
> > $         -ETC BLA BLA
> > 
> > shell-command-on-region turned out to be a bit impractical, because I lose my 
> > current position in the document, as the cursor jumps to the beginning when 
> > running shell-command-on-region. I guess I would have to write a LISP macro 
> > to fix that...!?
> 
> The mark-whole-buffer command (C-x h) pushes a mark at the original 
> location.  So after you run shell-command-on-region, you can use C-u 
> C-space C-u C-space to get back to where you were.
> 
> -- 
> Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
> Arlington, MA
> *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
> *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[super-nub]

Whoops, sorry, replied to the wrong post...
C-u C-space is also quite handy, I will try to write a macro that automates
eveything, thx!


super-nub wrote:
> 
> Wow, "occur" totally RULES! That's even more than I wanted to achieve!
> :) Thanks!
> The problem how to run an arbitrary shell command on the current file --
> be it via the text in the buffer or via the filename -- remains. Any
> ideas on that?
> 
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:32:16 -0500, "Barry Margolin"
> <barmar@alum.mit.edu> said:
>> In article <mailman.3545.1169683280.2155.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>,
>>  super-nub <scame@fastmail.fm> wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi Pete,
>> > 
>> > for example I want to execute `grep' on my buffer/file to get a survey
>> of the 
>> > section headings in my document (that I keep in a special format for
>> this 
>> > purpose), e.g.:
>> > 
>> > $ egrep '^\s*-[[:upper:]]+' myfile
>> > $ -INTRODUCTION
>> > $     -BLA BLA
>> > $     -BLA 2
>> > $ -MAIN PART
>> > $     -MISCELLANEOUS
>> > $         -ETC BLA BLA
>> > 
>> > shell-command-on-region turned out to be a bit impractical, because I
>> lose my 
>> > current position in the document, as the cursor jumps to the beginning
>> when 
>> > running shell-command-on-region. I guess I would have to write a LISP
>> macro 
>> > to fix that...!?
>> 
>> The mark-whole-buffer command (C-x h) pushes a mark at the original 
>> location.  So after you run shell-command-on-region, you can use C-u 
>> C-space C-u C-space to get back to where you were.
>> 
>> -- 
>> Barry Margolin, barmar@alum.mit.edu
>> Arlington, MA
>> *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***
>> *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
>> _______________________________________________
>> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
>> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> help-gnu-emacs mailing list
> help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Run-Shell-Command-on-Buffer-tf3084566.html#a8599699
Sent from the Emacs - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[super-nub]

Yes, that is exactly it, thanks very much!


reader-2 wrote:
> 
> It looks like `M-x occur' may be what you want.
> 
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Run-Shell-Command-on-Buffer-tf3084566.html#a8599789
Sent from the Emacs - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Drew Adams]

> > It looks like `M-x occur' may be what you want.
>
> Yes, that is exactly it, thanks very much!

If you like `occur', you might also be interested in this page:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/OccurMode.

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Ted Zlatanov]

On 25 Jan 2007, drew.adams@oracle.com wrote:

>>> It looks like `M-x occur' may be what you want.
>>
>> Yes, that is exactly it, thanks very much!
>
> If you like `occur', you might also be interested in this page:
> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/OccurMode.

Also, the next-error/previous-error commands, which work under
grep/occur/compilation modes, are very useful.  Try them.  I bind mine
to F6/F7:

(global-set-key [f6] 'next-error)
(global-set-key [f7] 'previous-error)

They will jump to the next/previous point of interest out of all the
grep/occur/compilation points of interest related to the current
buffer.

Drew: can you update the wiki with this info, or I'll do it?  Also,
can you check that your replace+.el (mentioned in the Emacs wiki)
works with next/previous error?

Ted

RE: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Drew Adams]

> > If you like `occur', you might also be interested in this page:
> > http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/OccurMode.
> 
> Also, the next-error/previous-error commands, which work under
> grep/occur/compilation modes, are very useful.  Try them.  I bind mine
> to F6/F7:
> 
> (global-set-key [f6] 'next-error)
> (global-set-key [f7] 'previous-error)
> 
> They will jump to the next/previous point of interest out of all the
> grep/occur/compilation points of interest related to the current
> buffer.

I think that is only the case for Emacs 22.

> Drew: can you update the wiki with this info, or I'll do it?

Done.

> Also, can you check that your replace+.el (mentioned in the Emacs wiki)
> works with next/previous error?

Yes, it works.

Re: Run Shell Command on Buffer

[Ted Zlatanov]

On 25 Jan 2007, drew.adams@oracle.com wrote:

>>> If you like `occur', you might also be interested in this page:
>>> http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/OccurMode.
>>
>> Also, the next-error/previous-error commands, which work under
>> grep/occur/compilation modes, are very useful.  Try them.  I bind mine
>> to F6/F7:
>>
>> (global-set-key [f6] 'next-error)
>> (global-set-key [f7] 'previous-error)
>>
>> They will jump to the next/previous point of interest out of all the
>> grep/occur/compilation points of interest related to the current
>> buffer.
>
> I think that is only the case for Emacs 22.

You're right, I forgot.  Sorry.

Ted