Kourosh Neshatian wrote (on Sun, 4 Sep 2011 at 15:57 +1200): > I wonder if you could reproduce the error. No, see below. > > Steps to reproduce the error: > > > > 1. Alice (user name 'alice') runs Emacs with 'emacs -q --no-site-file' > > > > 2. Alice creates a text file in the directory, say 'document.tex', writes > > some text in it and saves it. > > > > 3. She runs 'vc-next-action' (C-x v v) and chooses RCS as her > > backend. This creates an RCS file 'RCS/document.tex,v'. > > > > 4. Alice checks out and locks the file again by 'vc-next-action' (C-x > > v v) to add/make some changes in the document. I did the following as normal user A: umask 0 mkdir ~/foo echo "test" > foo/1 emacs-23.3 -Q foo/1 C-x v v RCS RET RET # now registered with RCS C-x v v # now file is checked out > > 5. Meanwhile, Bob (user name 'bob') logs in.  He has access to the RCS > > directory (usually via a symbolic link). He checks out document.tex > > stealing  the lock (rcs -l ...). I logged in as normal user B and did: emacs-23.3 -Q ~A/foo/1 Emacs says "Note: file is write protected". C-x v v steal the lock yes/no? yes RET A mail buffer pops up, prompting me to send an email to user A explaining why I stole the lock. I do so. > > 6. Now, Alice has finished editing her copy; she saves the file and > > runs 'vc-next-action' (to check in). Emacs will ask her if she wants > > to steal the lock, she says 'yes'. What happens is that Emacs > > over-writes her local copy by the last version in the > > repository. Alice's changes/edits are all gone and apparently she does > > not have any means to recover! Back in user A's still-running Emacs, I type some text in the still open buffer. Emacs says: file changed on disk; really edit the buffer? I answer yes, type some text and save. Emacs says: file has changed since visited or saved. Save anyway? I answer yes. Emacs says: file is write-protected; try to save anyway? I answer yes. I then do C-x v v and try to check in the file. This fails, with an error message that the file is locked by user B. This was with RCS 5.7. I never notmally use RCS, maybe I am missing something.