From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mike Mattie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: is it possible to indicate collum of execution position as well as line in gud ? Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 06:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: <20061202060106.42b098dc@reforged> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2035064382==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165068121 16324 80.91.229.2 (2 Dec 2006 14:02:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 02 15:01:58 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVRF-000217-8j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 15:01:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVRE-0001FW-Tq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:01:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVQj-0001EO-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:01:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVQg-0001Dj-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GqVQg-0001DL-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [64.233.182.189] (helo=nf-out-0910.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GqVQf-0008R6-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 09:01:21 -0500 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so3902168nfe for ; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 06:01:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=rAN4y7FJBFTSGRKEnxdQySUL5BCAETDlF813qUOP/y1kK4EAFEWyQleBPvEwvQM1mZsoWutP8VFXmqtk+Ni/r/X9uu3MmyxasuSTk+8TbeDFfxIeLtWdwUaZrexiJdtD0WfvIapf4yozAXeNaOBk7PLU3FFAXVWU1fPeV2YdAmo= Original-Received: by 10.78.200.3 with SMTP id x3mr5894476huf.1165068079653; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 06:01:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from reforged ( [67.185.2.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm29687478hui.2006.12.02.06.01.18; Sat, 02 Dec 2006 06:01:19 -0800 (PST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63223 Archived-At: --===============2035064382== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_+Dvp2OxGzMnhl3zU_AscseC; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 --Sig_+Dvp2OxGzMnhl3zU_AscseC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I use cperl-mode quite a bit with the debugger. I tend to favor map like ex= pressions and when stepping with gud (which works quite well by the way), execution of the map= 's block just stays on the same line not really giving me any indication of where the exe= cution path has gone. A more generalized example of this is: ; ; here gud will visually drop the execution flow as well by only rendering th= e line=20 position. I would guess (haven't used it yet) that the elisp/lisp debugger would indi= cate the collumn with how free-flowing lisp expressions can be. My question is this: can markers such as the gud caret be placed in the buf= fer ? Some sort of "between the lines" marker ? If the answer is yes it seems to = me that=20 gud could indicate the collumn of the execution point. Not a bug , or even a feature request, just a question. off-topic: With all those bug reports you guys are working on for the next release it might seem like there are alot of problems in emacs. I have been happily using emacs 22.90.1 on both a Gentoo x86 GNU/Linux machine, and a darwin-ppc laptop for a while now, without a single crash. It's faster, better integra= ted,=20 and more functionally efficient than anything I have used previously. In sh= ort the new emacs sparkles. happy holidays, Mike Mattie --Sig_+Dvp2OxGzMnhl3zU_AscseC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFcYcjdfRchrkBInkRAt/fAJ4yfBsy8QHLN+V78J3zcCyQiPxKCACgzAU+ HCrBgEpRCbkGu1tObhIdvzc= =ngv1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_+Dvp2OxGzMnhl3zU_AscseC-- --===============2035064382== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel --===============2035064382==--