From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Mac - why no proxy badge for dired mode? Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:54:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20061104.195447.144388748.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> References: <86fyczocvd.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86wt6bmv7m.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162637728 21586 80.91.229.2 (4 Nov 2006 10:55:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 04 11:55:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgJBB-0003yr-Ez for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 11:55:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgJBA-0005TH-LE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GgJAw-0005Qs-H5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:54:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GgJAu-0005NG-GK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GgJAu-0005Mp-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GgJAu-0000jF-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:54:56 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510D2CCA; Sat, 4 Nov 2006 19:54:49 +0900 (JST) Original-To: merlyn@stonehenge.com In-Reply-To: <86wt6bmv7m.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 22.0 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61756 Archived-At: >>>>> On 04 Nov 2006 01:12:29 -0800, merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) said: > Well, then is there some other way to nudge the mac code to do the > right thing for dired buffers? I suspect it'll take changes on both > sides. I doubt whether displaying the proxy icon for a dired buffer is the right thing. Is there any application having that behavior? Also, the icon is not draggable when the buffer modification flag is set. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp