From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode-2 branch segfaulting on MacOS X? Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:43:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20061028004309.GB2722@gothmog.pc> References: <453C37D6.9090206@cis.upenn.edu> <453C92AF.7060100@cis.upenn.edu> <453CBBD5.9010900@cis.upenn.edu> <4541D9FD.6030707@cis.upenn.edu> <20061028004142.GA2722@gothmog.pc> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161997191 16275 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2006 00:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Geoffrey Alan Washburn , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 28 02:59:49 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdcII-0002O2-K6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 02:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdcIH-0002i5-Gd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:43:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GdcHi-0002g5-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GdcHe-0002dL-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:42:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdcHe-0002d7-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.1.205.36] (helo=igloo.linux.gr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1GdcHe-0002io-F9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:42:46 -0400 Original-Received: from gothmog.pc (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-2) with ESMTP id k9S0gZc6005297 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:42:35 +0300 Original-Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9S0hAUI002801; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:43:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Original-Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id k9S0hACu002800; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 03:43:10 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Original-To: Kenichi Handa Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061028004142.GA2722@gothmog.pc> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-2.545, required 5, AWL -0.15, BAYES_00 -2.60, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61261 Archived-At: On 2006-10-28 03:41, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-10-27 16:38, Kenichi Handa wrote: > > In article <4541D9FD.6030707@cis.upenn.edu>, Geoffrey Alan Washburn writes: > > > > > > It seems that the stack (or the symbol table is) is > > > > completely broken. Please rebuild emacs with this: > > > > % make CFLAGS=-g clean all > > > > and check if Emacs segfaults at the same place or not. > > > > > Thanks. Same place, but slightly different results. > > > > Thank you. Now the result is meaningful. > > > > > $4 = {66909105, 66836681, 58898315} > > > (gdb) p styles[i] > > > $5 = 58898315 > > > (gdb) xtype > > > Lisp_String > > > (gdb) pp styles[i] > > > "" > > > > Hmmm, this means that your "bitstream vera sans mono" font > > doesn't have FC_WIDTH property. Very strange. What does > > this command return? > > > > % fc-list 'bitstream vera sans mon' width > > FWIW, it doesn't return anything here: > > % fc-list 'bitstream vera sans mon' width > % fc-list 'bitstream vera sans mon' width | hd > % But rebuilding the fc-cache now returns: % fc-list 'bitstream vera sans mono' width :width=100 % Hmmm :)