From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: problems on inline input on Mac Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:50:39 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20060728.155039.176841546.kazu@iij.ad.jp> References: <20060728.125820.34684979.kazu@iij.ad.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154069467 31320 80.91.229.2 (28 Jul 2006 06:51:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 06:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 08:51:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6MBY-0001v8-25 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:51:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6MBX-0002HS-Dd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6MBK-0002FG-Kf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G6MBI-0002EP-1H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:50:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6MBH-0002EI-TX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [210.138.20.175] (helo=otm-mgo01.iij.ad.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G6MDD-0001bV-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:52:43 -0400 Original-Received: OTM-MO(otm-mgo01) id k6S6ofFi051608; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:50:41 +0900 (JST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/simple; d=iij.ad.jp; s=omgo0; t=1154069441; bh=eA7I0kTHNW9xwlVuMe1yQ8X2o1E=; h=Received:Received: Date:Message-Id:To:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=L5JNjHhM5tGi mwglOyvKqnn+PDb/MqPdYBXpzvukC5fH041xVQ+NHySVqwKV1SR081M2db3QZpI5GMH mS/Hu/rjt4+ZIYRd7oWxopSiCFlieTKABvfctW5RI+dNAzUDTpLzUUnxCMxO355KupY M/dkz8/DyQTd46ulMDmpvJPQw= Original-Received: OTM-MIX(otm-mix00) id k6S6ofjP024916; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:50:41 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from localhost (h122n190.iij.ad.jp [192.168.190.122]) by rsmtp.iij.ad.jp (OTM-MR/rsmtp) id k6S6oeCv027220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:50:41 +0900 (JST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.50 on Emacs 22.0.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57719 Archived-At: Hello, > > Other inline input mechanisms (like "tamago") makes use of buffer > > itself. I guess many people agree that this approach is good. > > It would be helpful to think the TSM support (including inline input > support) on Mac corresponds to the XIM support on X11 rather than > Emacs-level input methods such as tamago and leim. Then I think > you'll naturally understand its behavior. I don't know this area well. But my point is that the previous implementation of inline input by Hashimoto-san was perfect to me. And the current code is not. I'm sticking to the privous implementation on the Mac environment at this moment. --Kazu Yamamoto