From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Agustin Martin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-process bug Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 01:07:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20060529230738.GA5461@agmartin.aq.upm.es> References: <87odxjakox.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jrlewm.fsf@lrde.org> <87pshyqgtd.fsf@lrde.org> <87fyiuq9t5.fsf@lrde.org> <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1148945520 20982 80.91.229.2 (29 May 2006 23:32:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 23:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 30 01:31:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkrDI-0001ae-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 May 2006 01:31:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkrDH-00078y-IX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:31:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkrD5-00078t-CB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FkrD3-00078b-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FkrD3-00078R-GU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [138.100.4.49] (helo=edison.ccupm.upm.es) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FkrIi-0001yD-PE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 May 2006 19:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: from debian ([138.100.247.74]) by edison.ccupm.upm.es (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4TNVaUV013099; Tue, 30 May 2006 01:31:36 +0200 Original-Received: by debian (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 597BB18CDD; Tue, 30 May 2006 01:07:38 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877j45rj3w.fsf@lrde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by edison.ccupm.upm.es id k4TNVaUV013099 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55462 Archived-At: On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 10:26:43PM +0200, Micha=EBl Cadilhac wrote: > (Final ?) patch attached. >=20 > Agustin, can you check that you can't trigger the bug anymore? >=20 Tested in my system with the (Final ?)+2 (The new-new-new patch), not the one you have just sent with '#ifdef SIGCHLD' removed but the previous one. I tested repeated switching between flyspellized buffers. Running emacs-snapshot + your patches in a Debian unstable box seems to work very well. Thanks a lot. --=20 Agustin