From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: AUCTex Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2006 12:41:45 -0700 Message-ID: <200604051941.k35Jfjdr014778@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> References: <9508491d0603300327i6da294bcp553f2f48df85d65f@mail.gmail.com> <8764lue3jv.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <9508491d0604021712r78136dco5e33b05a3d39109b@mail.gmail.com> <200604030049.k330ng5B001885@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <85d5fza34i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <200604030116.k331GXLa002475@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <858xqna1ct.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <200604041738.k34HchMI017592@scanner2.ics.uci.edu> <85odzh3v0h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1144266224 11847 80.91.229.2 (5 Apr 2006 19:43:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 19:43:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 05 21:43:41 2006 Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org> Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDuf-0005Uk-Bo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:43:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDue-0002r4-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDu1-0002Wo-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:42:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDtz-0002Vd-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:42:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FRDtz-0002VW-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:42:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [128.195.1.36] (helo=scanner2.ics.uci.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FRDxW-0001kQ-Ki; Wed, 05 Apr 2006 15:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from vino.ics.uci.edu (vino.ics.uci.edu [128.195.11.198]) by scanner2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k35Jfjdr014778; Wed, 5 Apr 2006 12:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <85odzh3v0h.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 04 Apr 2006 23:12:30 +0200") Original-Lines: 19 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@vino.ics.uci.edu X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel> List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>, <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe> Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52453 Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/52453> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes: > Dan Nicolaescu <dann@ics.uci.edu> writes: > > > Anyway, the main question is: Do AUCTeX maintainers want to > > integrate it in Emacs anytime soon? (Or at all?) > > I answered that question already in the previous post, but you snipped > the reply. AUCTeX is not going to be integrated into Emacs anytime > soon due to outstanding copyright assignments, and the process of > collecting them is progressing rather slowly. So what is the way forward for this? What can be done to improve the situation? Would distributing AUCTeX like leim was distributed in previous emacs versions help? (i.e. leim distributed separately, but it could be unpacked in the emacs source tree and compiled and installed together). Just an idea...