From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:57:55 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200603102357.k2ANvtW07688@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200603081955.k28JtxHO009985@chls308.ch.intel.com> <87oe0gu1kb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17423.16884.499749.8016@chls308.ch.intel.com> <87u0a8a9ki.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <17423.28072.2696.723424@chls308.ch.intel.com> <87zmk05vrz.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87irqn659u.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1142035426 13925 80.91.229.2 (11 Mar 2006 00:03:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 00:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: amscott1@sedona.ch.intel.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 11 01:03:45 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHra8-00009k-Da for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:03:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHra8-0002UB-2H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHrZn-0002Rs-6v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:03:19 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FHrZl-0002Lv-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:03:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FHrZl-0002Ld-CF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FHrd9-0006cY-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:06:47 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k2B032Oq003989; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:03:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id k2ANvtW07688; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:57:55 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: cyd@stupidchicken.com In-reply-to: <87irqn659u.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (message from Chong Yidong on Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:50:53 -0500) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.1 (manatee.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.104]); Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:03:03 -0600 (CST) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:51447 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: Note that allowing saves for risky local variables is practically equivalent to eliminating the concept of risky local variables. If Emacs allows saves for any variable not considered safe, the `risky-local-variable' property has no special effect (as far as the loading of local variables is concerned). I believe that Richard decided that _every_ variable should be considered risky, except when explicitly marked safe. It would seem that this new concept of riskiness supersedes the old one and renders it obsolete. Sincerely, Luc.