From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Inconsistency in whole buffer buttons. Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:17:43 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <200601132217.k0DMHgm05718@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137192386 3652 80.91.229.2 (13 Jan 2006 22:46:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 13 23:46:19 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExXgR-0007uH-Ef for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:46:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExXia-0000Wt-Qv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:48:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ExXJp-0007pP-MF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:22:49 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ExXJm-0007nw-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ExXJl-0007nd-MG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:22:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExXMo-0000O1-PN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:25:54 -0500 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.13.3+Sun/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0DMKUqI027856; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:20:30 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id k0DMHgm05718; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:17:43 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: drew.adams@oracle.com In-reply-to: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.1 (manatee.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.104]); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:20:31 -0600 (CST) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49037 Archived-At: Drew Adams wrote: Regarding Luc's proposals for changes after the release (sorry for the length) - The concrete immediate question in this thread was, should the whole buffer buttons ask for confirmation in single option buffers? The only reason to do so would be uniformity of behavior among Custom buffers. The reason why I mentioned possible changes after the release is that I believe that the situation in single option buffers is so different from that in multi-option buffers that it would be good to make them _less_ alike after the release to rationalize the look and behavior of both. Sincerely, Luc.