From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TAB in Eval: prompt in minibuffer? Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:58:54 +0200 Message-ID: <200512070058.55299.pogonyshev@gmx.net> References: <4394DED5.2070500@student.lu.se> <87zmnf7y62.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133911142 16312 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 23:19:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 23:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se, cyd@stupidchicken.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 00:18:53 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejm3H-00046R-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2005 00:16:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejm3T-0000X5-M0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:17:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjluW-0004Nl-Sn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:07:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjluU-0004N2-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:07:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjluU-0004Mx-P2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:07:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EjlvE-00050b-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:08:33 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Dec 2005 23:01:06 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO [194.158.213.166]) [194.158.213.166] by mail.gmx.net (mp021) with SMTP; 07 Dec 2005 00:01:06 +0100 X-Authenticated: #16844820 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47084 Archived-At: Richard M. Stallman wrote: > > What's the point of indenting lisp expressions in the minibuffer? > > Indenting Lisp expressions in the minibuffer is useless. > > It is not totally useless, but its usefulness is rather rare. > However, since completion is not that common, and since it > is easy enough on M-TAB, I agree we should make no change. Well, all modern desktops bind M-TAB to window switching, so Emacs is left with `ESC TAB' only, which is not that easy. Paul