From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Custom themes
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:28:25 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200506290428.j5T4SPp25779@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DnTim-0006g2-UT@fencepost.gnu.org> (rms@gnu.org)
Richard Stallman wrote:
That sounds like a good approach. I see a few approaches that
could make sense:
1. Most recent takes priority.
2. Let user specify the priority order.
3. Don't allow loading themes that conflict.
4. Ask the user what to do, each time there is a conflict.
It would appear that "unrequiring" of individual themes does not
currently work after all, as I already pointed out. In that case,
just allowing to require or load implements (1): Most recent wins.
I do not understand "unconditional loading". Could you explain
what you mean by that?
`require-theme' checks whether the theme already has been loaded, by
checking whether it is a member of `features'. In other words, it
works just like a regular require. If it is already in features,
`require-theme' does nothing. By "unconditional loading", I mean
just loading the file without checking anything. My latest patches
just mention both possibilities and let the user decide.
I believe that a really natural and intuitive implementation of
unrequiring individual themes (in fact just implementing _any_
unrequiring of individual themes) requires a lot more work. The
current Custom Themes code does not appear to come close to succeeding
in implementing _any_ form of individual unrequiring. My original
impression that it did was erroneous. I doubt that the current Custom
themes code even can be used as a _basis_ for that.
Sincerely,
Luc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-29 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-25 0:31 Custom themes Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-25 1:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-25 1:57 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-25 16:40 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-26 3:19 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-26 15:04 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-28 1:21 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-28 1:42 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-28 18:47 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-28 18:46 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-28 20:09 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-27 9:56 ` Per Abrahamsen
2005-06-28 4:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-06-28 14:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-29 3:58 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-29 4:28 ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2005-06-30 5:36 ` David Kastrup
2005-06-30 23:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-07-01 22:44 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-07-02 12:33 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-07-04 0:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-30 12:53 ` Per Abrahamsen
2005-06-28 14:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-28 21:29 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-29 3:17 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-29 20:43 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-30 0:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-30 5:32 ` David Kastrup
2005-06-30 15:49 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-30 15:49 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-25 3:25 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-25 16:40 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-25 18:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-25 21:01 ` Frank Schmitt
2005-06-25 21:59 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-25 22:03 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-06-26 4:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-11 5:15 Chong Yidong
2010-10-11 7:48 ` Deniz Dogan
2010-10-11 15:34 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-11 16:09 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2010-10-11 17:38 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-11 21:04 ` Eric Lilja
2010-10-12 14:08 ` Joel James Adamson
2010-10-12 20:25 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-12 23:40 ` Eric Lilja
2010-10-13 0:04 ` Christoph
2010-10-13 2:15 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-13 20:06 ` David De La Harpe Golden
2010-10-14 4:23 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-14 4:58 ` Miles Bader
2010-10-13 0:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2010-10-13 2:14 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-13 10:20 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-10-13 15:06 ` CHENG Gao
2010-10-13 16:05 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-14 15:53 ` Chong Yidong
2010-10-14 16:47 ` Juanma Barranquero
2010-10-16 18:33 ` Chong Yidong
2005-07-29 13:54 Richard M. Stallman
2005-06-17 18:45 Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200506290428.j5T4SPp25779@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
--to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.