From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: require-hard-newlines to use newline
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:26:56 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <200503081826.j28IQug00953@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
References: <1483.220.255.172.231.1109730379.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<200503020302.j2232fR21722@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<2750.220.255.172.231.1109734015.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<E1D6g5c-0001RT-U5@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<1415.220.255.169.59.1109818150.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<E1D6xOA-0008IH-S5@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<1404.220.255.169.59.1109889146.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<200503040033.j240XD022473@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<50554.203.116.59.23.1109897782.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<fc339e4a05030317401914398e@mail.gmail.com>
	<E1D7MUn-0002RD-O4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200503080005.j2805Kg28696@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<1057.220.255.169.59.1110247845.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<200503080428.j284SD928952@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<200503081545.j28FjAV29254@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<2462.220.255.169.59.1110300154.squirrel@www.stupidchicken.com>
	<jwvbr9uvwup.fsf-mo
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110319958 3649 80.91.229.2 (8 Mar 2005 22:12:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 22:12:38 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 23:12:37 2005
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8jcV-0000nX-N1
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 19:39:52 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8jr1-0006DT-La
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:54:51 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8jmw-0004Uw-0c
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:50:38 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1D8jmi-0004QA-0x
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:50:33 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D8jmf-0004LO-VE
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:50:22 -0500
Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D8jQ5-0002wM-Fn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:27:01 -0500
Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29])
	by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	j28IR09N023704; Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:27:01 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost)
	by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id j28IQug00953;
	Tue, 8 Mar 2005 12:26:56 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to
	teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f
Original-To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
In-reply-to: <jwvbr9uvwup.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:04:35 -0500)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34344
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34344

I guess that, In Chong's message, I confused byte-compile with
byte-compile-file.  What I believed was strange is that byte compiling
the file produced no warning messages, but maybe that is due to the
variable occurring in defadvice.

Sincerely,

Luc.