From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Pogonyshev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: progress reporting again Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 17:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <200411261721.27083.pogonyshev@gmx.net> References: <200411151813.44859.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101482433 19898 80.91.229.6 (26 Nov 2004 15:20:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 16:20:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CXhta-0001ir-00 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:20:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXi2q-00051z-6F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:30:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXi2Z-000517-IY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:29:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CXi2Y-00050A-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:29:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CXi2X-000507-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:29:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [213.165.64.20] (helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CXhsT-00056C-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:19:18 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 26709 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Nov 2004 15:19:13 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (EHLO localhost.localdomain) (195.50.12.117) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 26 Nov 2004 16:19:12 +0100 X-Authenticated: #16844820 Original-To: Harald Maier , Stefan Monnier User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30389 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30389 Harald Maier wrote (on November 18): > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> > Can anyone who uses SES mode check if the following patch works > >>> > fine? I think it is generally a good idea to unify progress > >>> > reporting as much as possible in Emacs. > >>> > > >>> > I didn't touch `ses-time-check' function, since progress messages > >>> > used with it are non-standard. > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, I got the following error: > >>> > >>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function row) > >>> row(3) > >>> ses-setup() > >>> ses-mode() > >>> ... > > > > Probably becuse you've compiled ses.el with an Emacs that uses an old > > subr.el. You have to follow the steps: > > - recompile subr.el. > > - redump your Emacs. > > - recompile ses.el. > > You are right. I did not redump emacs. I assume that this is a general > rule when the file subr.el changes. So, can anyone apply the patch? It seems that we have agreed it has no problems. Paul P.S. Here is the patch archived: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2004-11/msg00622.html