From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: a simple convenience function Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:34:49 -0500 Message-ID: <20041114233449.GC12968@fencepost> References: <200411142336.00131.pogonyshev@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100475382 28300 80.91.229.6 (14 Nov 2004 23:36:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 23:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 15 00:36:14 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CTTuo-00069T-00 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:36:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTU3T-0003R9-Rf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:45:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTU3G-0003R1-8Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CTU3F-0003Qp-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CTU3F-0003Qm-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CTTuK-0007hZ-IQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:35:44 -0500 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CTTtR-0004JA-1X; Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:34:49 -0500 Original-To: Paul Pogonyshev Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411142336.00131.pogonyshev@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29846 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29846 On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 11:36:00PM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > I'm not sure this issue wasn't raised already, but what do > you think about adding this simple function to Emasc? There's already `back-to-indentation', bound to M-m by default. I don't think the repeat-functionality you described seems really worth adding another function. -Miles -- "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." Mahatma Ghandi