From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-c C-{l,r} in Enriched mode. Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:16:04 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200410010216.i912G4u08551@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200409300305.i8U35NF21051@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87hdpfvduo.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1096597088 10360 80.91.229.6 (1 Oct 2004 02:18:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 04:18:01 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CDCzh-0000tp-00 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:18:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDD67-0000Wy-Gv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDD5x-0000VI-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CDD5v-0000Tz-TH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CDD5v-0000Tu-PX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDCyW-0006vP-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i912GciU015483; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:16:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i912G4u08551; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:16:04 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: alex@emacswiki.org In-reply-to: <87hdpfvduo.fsf@emacswiki.org> (message from Alex Schroeder on Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:57:51 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27772 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27772 Alex Schroeder wrote: Actually we have global keybindings, we have a convention for major modes, and a convention for users to put their bindings. Do we have something like that for minor modes as well? I cannot remember. Yes, but minor modes do not get much and they are not supposed to interfere with each other. That is, a minor mode is not supposed to use a binding used by any other minor mode. >>From `(elisp)Coding Conventions': * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by `{', `}', `<', `>', `:' or `;' are also reserved for major modes. * Sequences consisting of `C-c' followed by any other punctuation character are allocated for minor modes. Using them in a major mode is not absolutely prohibited, but if you do that, the major mode binding may be shadowed from time to time by minor modes. That is not a lot of bindings for all minor modes combined. Sincerely, Luc.