From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ed Reingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patches to calendar Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:10:04 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200409211410.i8LEA4GJ019373@emr.cs.iit.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1095775863 31911 80.91.229.6 (21 Sep 2004 14:11:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 21 16:10:50 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9lM1-0002X1-00 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:10:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9lRx-0004Qv-H7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C9lRo-0004Nm-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C9lRn-0004Mj-E6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:16:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9lRn-0004MY-4X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:16:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [216.47.143.101] (helo=email2.iit.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C9lLP-00046o-Sk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from emr.cs.iit.edu (emr.cs.iit.edu [216.47.142.126]) by email2.iit.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4E0090M9Z3JE@email2.iit.edu> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:09:03 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from emr.cs.iit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by emr.cs.iit.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i8LEA4GJ019373; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:10:04 -0500 (CDT) In-reply-to: "Message from Emilio C. Lopes" "of Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:35:11 -0000." Original-To: "Emilio C. Lopes" X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 11/23/2002 with nmh-1.0.4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27370 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27370 > Glenn Morris wrote: > > > Emilio Lopes wrote: > > >> Besides the new command `calendar-goto-iso-week' > > > > I don't think it's worth adding a whole new function which duplicates > > practically the entire code from calendar-goto-iso-date, just for > > this. I prefer the code as proposed last, not the version Emilio included in the last message: it is cleaner and consistent with other code. There is no justification to omitting a useful function just because it it is similar to an existing one. The calendar code contains many "go-to date" functions that are similar, but useful.