From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired" Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:05:46 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200408220405.i7M45k906684@raven.dms.auburn.edu> References: <20040821.040855.00470268.jet@gyve.org> <200408210040.i7L0eCT04605@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <20040821.153827.153433523.jet@gyve.org> <200408212035.i7LKZjn06098@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <01c487fb$Blat.v2.2.2$f7072c40@zahav.net.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093147623 9787 80.91.224.253 (22 Aug 2004 04:07:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 04:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jet@gyve.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 06:06:50 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Byjd3-00019Y-00 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:06:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByjhR-0000dg-Q2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ByjhK-0000dY-Lt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1ByjhJ-0000dL-Si for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1ByjhJ-0000dI-Pu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ByjcZ-00037a-Fo; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:06:19 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7M46DuE017109; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:06:13 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i7M45k906684; Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:05:46 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: eliz@gnu.org In-reply-to: <01c487fb$Blat.v2.2.2$f7072c40@zahav.net.il> (eliz@gnu.org) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26392 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26392 Eli Zaretskii wrote: I admit that I don't see how is this relevant to the issue of ?.uu, though. Not if we go for the generic solution I eventually wound up proposing. But earlier I was thinking of allowing specific characters to act analogously to space. Those would be the characters used to make files invisible and characters used as extensions. I now believe a generic solution is better. Sincerely, Luc.