From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Masatake YAMATO Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info inconsistency about "Shell Commands in Dired" Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:17:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040822.131715.41632842.jet@gyve.org> References: <200408212249.i7LMncn06287@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200408212308.i7LN8rD06304@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200408212312.i7LNCLY06315@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093148405 10746 80.91.224.253 (22 Aug 2004 04:20:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 04:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 06:19:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Byjpj-0001RB-00 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 06:19:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Byju7-00044h-LO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:24:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Byjtv-00044V-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Byjtv-00044C-0p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Byjtu-000449-UQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:24:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [210.130.136.40] (helo=r-maa.spacetown.ne.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ByjpF-0004vq-7l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 00:19:25 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (h219-110-074-165.catv01.itscom.jp [219.110.74.165]) by r-maa.spacetown.ne.jp (8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7M4JDX14247; Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:19:13 +0900 (JST) Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-Reply-To: <200408212312.i7LNCLY06315@raven.dms.auburn.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26393 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26393 How do you think using `format' function directly instead of `?' ? e.g. uuencode %s %s > %s.uu Advantage: - If the user want to `%' itself in the command line, format function can handle it: echo %%s - Implementation is not so difficult(for us). - Substitution rule is not so difficult(for users). Disadvantage - We have to throw away everything about `?', the manual description, code, and the users' experience. Masatake