From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Checkout of Emacs CVS through firewall Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:54:16 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040612225416.GA13930@fencepost> References: <20040612144928.1523.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <1190-Sat12Jun2004203223+0300-eliz@gnu.org> <20040613000915.B07F.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1087080897 20937 80.91.224.253 (12 Jun 2004 22:54:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 13 00:54:50 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZHOk-0005Ly-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:54:50 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZHOj-0006w7-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:54:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZHPY-0002du-8g for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZHPQ-0002dL-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZHPP-0002d2-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZHPP-0002cs-7L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:55:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZHOD-0002Ez-60 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BZHOC-0003nn-Rc; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:54:16 -0400 Original-To: Juanma Barranquero Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040613000915.B07F.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24887 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24887 On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 12:10:33AM +0200, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > > What is the problem with that line, anyway? (I didn't follow this > > thread closely enough, so if it was already described, please point me > > at the appropriate message.) > > Not a big problem: Arch complained that it knew about a file which > had disappeared (Makefile.in, not Makefile.unix). But I'm wondering > whether the line is, in fact, useful at all. Note that this reflects a general truism -- your makefiles probably shouldn't be screwing with your source files, unless you actually intend to _change_ them, especially if you're using a source-control system. -Miles -- Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature.