From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug in comment-region Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:09:20 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040609210920.GA12578@fencepost> References: <20040609.153607.169254418.wl@gnu.org> <20040609.160802.116374946.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086815414 19195 80.91.224.253 (9 Jun 2004 21:10:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: quarl+dated+1087221580.02c4f1@nospam.quarl.org, quarl@nospam.quarl.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 09 23:10:01 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYAKe-0007Bi-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:10:00 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BYAKe-00084g-00 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 23:10:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYALI-0004vI-OY for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYALG-0004vC-RK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BYALG-0004v0-D4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BYALG-0004ux-8w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYAK1-0001KR-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BYAK0-0004DK-F0; Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:09:20 -0400 Original-To: Werner LEMBERG Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040609.160802.116374946.wl@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24783 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24783 On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 04:08:02PM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Thanks. Anyway, my suggestion w.r.t. C-u still holds -- IMHO it is > quite inconvenient to control the behaviour of such a versatile > function with a global variable. `comment-region' and `comment-dwim' already have a (much more useful) meaning for C-u (in fact, comment-region has several). -Miles -- We have met the enemy, and he is us. -- Pogo