From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display word wrapping Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:28 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040531191828.GB2501@fencepost> References: <20040531013831.AA50.LEKTU@mi.madritel.es> <20040531153907.3F41.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <2914-Mon31May2004195553+0300-eliz@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086031128 4349 80.91.224.253 (31 May 2004 19:18:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 19:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon May 31 21:18:42 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUsJ0-00045n-00 for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 21:18:42 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BUsJ0-0000Lp-00 for ; Mon, 31 May 2004 21:18:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsJC-0007nj-LK for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsJ6-0007nK-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsJ5-0007n0-Hz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BUsJ5-0007mj-Ez for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BUsIn-0006eV-Bt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:29 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1BUsIm-0002Ty-TP; Mon, 31 May 2004 15:18:29 -0400 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2914-Mon31May2004195553+0300-eliz@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24298 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24298 On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 07:55:53PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > It isn't allowed to assume that. AFAIK, unlike the `register' > qualifier, `volatile' is not an advisory one, it's mandatory. IIRC, the _meaning_ of `volatile' is only described vaguely in the standard (so much so that many people consider it useless, e.g., I think Linus refuses to allow it). I wouldn't depend too much on it.... -Miles -- `...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]