From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: It is time for a feature freeze (it is NOW or never). Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 18:24:43 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040504222443.GA10432@fencepost> References: <87lll6v514.fsf@orebokech.com> <200404100109.KAA03816@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083710338 19479 80.91.224.253 (4 May 2004 22:38:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 22:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Kim F. Storm" , rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed May 05 00:38:44 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BL8Yl-0005hu-00 for ; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:38:43 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BL8Yl-0003at-01 for ; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:38:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BL8Ww-0003qx-Ss for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 18:36:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BL8WR-0003pe-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 18:36:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BL8Vv-0003ib-31 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 18:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BL8LK-0001nH-SL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 18:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1BL8LD-00038a-Ky; Tue, 04 May 2004 18:24:43 -0400 Original-To: David Kastrup Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22766 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22766 On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:21:18AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > So in order to avoid version overkill, I think that we would stay at > 21.x as long as we have "merely" extensive, but not fundamental > changes. I agree with this; I think unicode should be 22.0, at least nominally. -Miles -- `Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'