From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Suggestion for autorevert.el
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:28:10 -0600 (CST)
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200404020428.i324SAN24382@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
References: <87zna6l1kn.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net>
	<E1B6Pbp-0007YV-U5@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200404010330.i313Ug621242@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1B9651-00049M-Cn@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200404020409.i3249Vw24362@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080880380 9235 80.91.224.253 (2 Apr 2004 04:33:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 04:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: offby1@blarg.net, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 06:32:55 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B9GMQ-0007rR-00
	for <emacs-devel@deer.gmane.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 06:32:54 +0200
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1B9GMQ-0001Lx-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 06:32:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9GMJ-0004gW-8R
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 23:32:47 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9GKt-0004MI-Te
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 23:31:19 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9GK5-0002xZ-TN
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 23:31:01 -0500
Original-Received: from [131.204.53.104] (helo=manatee.dms.auburn.edu)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
	id 1B9GK4-0002wB-TF; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 23:30:28 -0500
Original-Received: from raven.dms.auburn.edu (raven.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.29])
	by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id
	i324UNKt005678; Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:30:27 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost)
	by raven.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id i324SAN24382;
	Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:28:10 -0600 (CST)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to
	teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f
Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu
In-reply-to: <200404020409.i3249Vw24362@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (message from
	Luc Teirlinck on Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:09:31 -0600 (CST))
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21185
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21185

>>From my previous message:

   As a side remark: is there ever any reason to use (buffer-file-name)
   instead of just buffer-file-name?  I used the latter, which produces
   stylistic inconsistency with prior code in autorevert.el.  If there
   are no objections, I would change the prior code.  (The patch below
   does not yet do that.)

Actually, I inadvertently sent a version of my patch which _does_
change the two prior occurrences of (buffer-file-name) to buffer-file-name.

Sincerely,

Luc.