From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion: Mapping of M-g should be goto-line Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:14:25 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040328211425.GD16537@fencepost> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080508615 18617 80.91.224.253 (28 Mar 2004 21:16:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , rms@gnu.org, jari.aalto@poboxes.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 23:16:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7heB-0005UR-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:16:47 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B7heB-0000Ke-00 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 23:16:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7hd3-0000ND-66 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:15:37 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7hcb-0000Mf-Ek for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:15:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B7hc5-00009j-Oo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:15:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B7hc5-00009a-GP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1B7hbt-0005ym-Oe; Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:14:25 -0500 Original-To: "Kim F. Storm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21031 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21031 On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 07:03:49PM +0200, Kim F. Storm wrote: > If we look for a binding for "text processor" modes only, it would be > more logical to have the face bindings on, e.g. > > C-c C-b => bold > C-c C-a => italic (easier to type that C-c C-i) > C-c C-d => default > etc. That's something to be wary of though, as it uses up so many bindings. It _might_ be appropriate for the most common faces in a pure word-processor mode, but I'd be afraid of it interfering with many other natural bindings in a mode that tried to add other functionality. -Miles -- .Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.