From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: new compile command doesn't coalesce errors on the same line Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:26:16 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <20040320082616.GA11718@fencepost> References: <20040317215208.5b0cb3e2.occitan@esperanto.org> <20040317224726.GC12561@fencepost> <20040320074137.2ea2c886.occitan@esperanto.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1079771836 26210 80.91.224.253 (20 Mar 2004 08:37:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 08:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, miles@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 09:37:09 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4bye-0000lq-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:37:08 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B4bye-0007HL-00 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 09:37:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4buo-0001v7-RV for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:33:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4bth-0001r3-TC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:32:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B4bt4-0001mP-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:31:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B4bsI-0001hO-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:30:34 -0500 Original-Received: from miles by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.24) id 1B4bo8-0003C3-9K; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 03:26:16 -0500 Original-To: Daniel Pfeiffer Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040320074137.2ea2c886.occitan@esperanto.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Blat: Foop X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:20636 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:20636 On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 07:41:37AM +0100, Daniel Pfeiffer wrote: > > Meanwhile, to the extent I can figure it out, I think this is indeed > > something else. Let's just change the code so as to treat > > contiguous errors as one. > > How contiguous do they have to be? How many lines apart may they be? Keep > this in mind: Where the old compile was bound to line-beginnings, the new > one can match a location anywhere on a line, even several different kinds > on the same line as in > > What would we gain? Why would I want to go to the same spot again if it is > mentioned 3 lines down, but not when it is mentioned on the next line? It has to _at least_ handle correctly the cases the old compile command did. Geez, I'm beginning to think it would be easier just to put the old one back. -Miles -- `Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'