From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Gud lord!
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:19:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030608021925.GA25632@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1055032089.30724.114.camel@lan1>
On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 05:28:04PM -0700, Robert Anderson wrote:
> I'd venture that a lot of such discussion as seen on various well-known
> discussion sites has often bordered on the inane, mostly from hastily
> drawn conclusions about a poorly understood system which does take some
> time to understand and appreciate
You're entitled to your opinion of course, but I've seen enough, from people
that I trust, to feel cautious.
Emacs is a fairly mature system, and has muddled along reasonably well with
CVS's brain-damage, so there's little need to make any quick decisions. I
think that at some point there'll be an obvious movement by a lot of projects
to adopt either subversion or arch (and I guess there are actually a few more
possible contenders). I'd guess that Emacs will probably switch too at some
point, and probably won't be the last -- but I don't think it should be among
the first.
Please don't take my comments to mean that I dislike arch -- I don't, from
what little I know about it, it seems like a very interesting and cool system.
In fact, I _like_ the idea of switching to something new and cool because I'm
as annoyed by CVS's bogosities as much as anyone (maybe more than most
people -- as I use a slow modem link, and I understand that arch handles
incremental updates much more efficiently than CVS [sending diffs both ways]),
but again, I think this is a place where some conservatism is warranted.
[Anyway, RMS is the maintainer, and I suspect he may be even more
conservative than me with regard to this issue.]
> > (1) the somewhat murky rules/conventions for designating source-controlled
> > files,
>
> They are defined by regexps. I don't think regexps can reasonably be
> considered "murky."
I think the issue was that this decision was based on names at all. I seem
to recall that there was a way to `register' files as well, but that there
were issues with that as well.
BTW, thank you for posting this, because at the least, it's some impetus to
look more closely at the current state of things.
-Miles
--
"Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that
you do it." Mahatma Ghandi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-08 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-07 15:37 Gud lord! Nick Roberts
2003-06-07 16:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-07 16:43 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 16:47 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 21:05 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-07 22:07 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-07 22:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-08 0:01 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-08 0:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-11 13:36 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-11 14:04 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-12 21:15 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-12 22:37 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11 14:32 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-12 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-12 15:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-12 15:54 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-07 23:47 ` Miles Bader
[not found] ` <1055032089.30724.114.camel@lan1>
2003-06-08 2:02 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-08 4:40 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-12 17:49 ` Per Abrahamsen
2003-06-08 2:19 ` Miles Bader [this message]
2003-06-07 22:59 ` yet another todo editing system Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 7:51 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 8:52 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 10:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 12:32 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-08 20:05 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-09 7:29 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 7:34 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 8:01 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 8:16 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 9:27 ` Kai Großjohann
2003-06-09 10:54 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 11:41 ` Alex Schroeder
2003-06-09 19:43 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-06-08 12:48 ` Alex Schroeder
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 10:05 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-09 10:29 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-15 15:59 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-16 1:44 ` Joe Corneli
2003-06-16 17:57 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Gud lord! Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 1:23 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-09 23:00 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-10 1:28 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-10 1:53 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-11 0:24 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 14:32 ` Robert Anderson
2003-06-10 12:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-10 12:54 ` David Kastrup
2003-06-10 17:10 ` Jonathan Walther
2003-06-11 8:27 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 7:51 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 8:11 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 8:32 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 8:42 ` Miles Bader
2003-06-09 8:56 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 13:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-06-09 14:07 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-11 13:00 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-06-11 13:53 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 0:21 ` Richard Stallman
2003-06-09 7:49 ` Juanma Barranquero
2003-06-09 19:29 ` Not arch (was Re: Gud lord!) Nick Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030608021925.GA25632@gnu.org \
--to=miles@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.