From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Divergence in menu appearance between Emacs Info and standalone Info Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:44:35 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200306051644.h55GiZ827258@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200306051630.h55GUPL00368@f7.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054833479 27690 80.91.224.249 (5 Jun 2003 17:17:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 17:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 05 19:17:54 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19NyN8-0007Bp-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 19:17:54 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19NyfC-00030v-00 for ; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 19:36:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19NyLH-0001kM-T8 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 13:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Ny5U-0003vf-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:59:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19NxxV-0001JC-15 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:51:27 -0400 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Nxqm-0007nv-GO; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 12:44:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) h55GiRoc028038; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:44:27 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h55GiZ827258; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 11:44:35 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: karl@freefriends.org In-reply-to: <200306051630.h55GUPL00368@f7.net> (karl@freefriends.org) Original-cc: rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14777 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14777 Karl Berry wrote: I had the impression that the decision had been made, namely to hide those node names by default. Are there other issues? Yes, as I pointed out in a follow-up, which crossed your reply in transit. I don't know when the next release of Emacs is likely to happen, but I bet it will be (long) before any Texinfo release incorporating the changes. So I will rewrite based on the current version of standalone Info. I think the documentation may need to be updated after 1 is done I will take a look at it after 1. is done (and preferably implemented). Again, to do a good job, I believe I need to know the details of 1. , not just the "big picture". I might have some further suggestions about these details, depending on the actual chosen reimplementation of node hiding. Sincerely, Luc.