From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: windmove and the minibuffer Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 11:05:30 -0500 (CDT) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200306011605.h51G5Uo22863@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <87d6i5oas9.fsf@gnu.org> <200305281927.h4SJRZo17911@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200305282011.h4SKBdc17953@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200306011546.h51FkSQ22849@eel.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054483787 7309 80.91.224.249 (1 Jun 2003 16:09:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2003 16:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jmbarranquero@laley.wke.es Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 01 18:09:45 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19MVOz-0001tj-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:09:45 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19MVfB-0003v5-00 for ; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 18:26:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MVLD-000383-7X for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MVKr-00037f-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:05:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19MVKp-000375-Gy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:05:28 -0400 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19MVKn-00036S-Tk; Sun, 01 Jun 2003 12:05:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) h51G5Noc003967; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 11:05:24 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) id h51G5Uo22863; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 11:05:30 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200306011546.h51FkSQ22849@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Sun, 1 Jun 2003 10:46:28 -0500 (CDT)) Original-cc: rms@gnu.org Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-cc: alex@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14558 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14558 >>From my previous message: A logical explanation for the variation in behavior for coordinates-in-window-p might be that if we wind up working with Lisp integers everything is OK and otherwise, we get bugs. This might not necessarily make sense. I quite simply do not know the involved C code well enough to be formulating conjectures. Sincerely, Luc.