From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Stefan Monnier" <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Docstring for define-key
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:40:07 -0500
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200302222040.h1MKe7c14775@rum.cs.yale.edu>
References: <20030221083232.8366.LEKTU@terra.es> <5xd6lloqfe.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk>
	<E18mdqO-0006bu-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045946501 783 80.91.224.249 (22 Feb 2003 20:41:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 20:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 18mgSp-0000CV-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:41:39 +0100
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 18mghT-0005yc-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 21:56:48 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18mgSx-0004UK-00
	for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:41:47 -0500
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18mgSE-0003rq-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:41:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18mgRN-0002hu-00
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:40:40 -0500
Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13)
	id 18mgRM-0002fq-00; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:40:08 -0500
Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost)
	by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1MKe7c14775;
	Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:40:07 -0500
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4
Original-To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Original-cc: Juanma Barranquero <lektu@terra.es>
Original-cc: storm@cua.dk
Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11862
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11862

> The first line should mention all the important arguments of the
> function, and should mention them in the order that they are written
> in a function call.

Why "in the order" ?
What's the advantage ?


	Stefan