From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Pohoyda Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: RMAIL, summary buffer need not be marked as modified Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:17:35 +0100 (CET) Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302122117.h1CLHZZh000624@oak.pohoyda.family> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045086226 30796 80.91.224.249 (12 Feb 2003 21:43:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18j4UV-00078i-00 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:32:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18j4W8-0002G8-00 for gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18j4Vd-0001pp-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:33:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18j4VX-0001fo-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:33:32 -0500 Original-Received: from imap.gmx.net ([213.165.65.60] helo=mail.gmx.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18j4VO-0001YP-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:33:22 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 23379 invoked by uid 0); 12 Feb 2003 21:33:20 -0000 Original-Received: from p508BE736.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oak.pohoyda.family) (80.139.231.54) by mail.gmx.net (mp008-rz3) with SMTP; 12 Feb 2003 21:33:20 -0000 Original-Received: from oak.pohoyda.family (oak.pohoyda.family [127.0.0.1]) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1CLHasN000627 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:17:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from apog@oak.pohoyda.family) Original-Received: (from apog@localhost) by oak.pohoyda.family (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h1CLHZZh000624; Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:17:35 +0100 (CET) Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:4442 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:4442 Hi again, I have to admit that the modified *RMAIL-summary* buffer irritates me. This buffer is generated by emacs, so there is nothing user should care about. The patch follows: --- rmailsum.el.orig Sun Jan 5 23:01:28 2003 +++ rmailsum.el Sun Jan 5 23:01:40 2003 @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ ;; We do this here to make the window the proper size. (rmail-select-summary nil) (set-buffer rmail-summary-buffer))) + ;; There is no need for the summary buffer to be marked as modified. + (set-buffer-modified-p nil) (rmail-summary-goto-msg mesg t t) (rmail-summary-construct-io-menu) (message "Computing summary lines...done"))) -- Alexander Pohoyda