From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:53:44 -0600 (CST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302070253.UAA25703@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <200302060106.TAA21443@eel.dms.auburn.edu> <5xel6lu3lh.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <5xadh9tyt3.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044586327 12016 80.91.224.249 (7 Feb 2003 02:52:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 02:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gycU-00037T-00 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 03:52:02 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18gylp-0006hu-00 for ; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 04:01:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gydy-0006CP-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:53:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gyde-00068y-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:53:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gydc-00067M-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gydb-00062G-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 21:53:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA07955; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:52:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id UAA25703; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 20:53:44 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: miles@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Miles Bader on 07 Feb 2003 11:07:22 +0900) Original-cc: handa@m17n.org Original-cc: ted@oconnor.cx Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11441 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11441 Miles Bader wrote: ?\_: Disadvantages: 1. Requires change in Emacs. Advantages: 1. Intuitive and concise. 2. Required change in Emacs is limited. I.e., the same as ?\s except with fewer disadvantages... As Handa pointed out, ?\_ would have broken tons of existing code, which, for whatever reason, used ?\_ instead of ?_ Breaking existing code is a big disadvantage. Sincerely, Luc.