From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:31:32 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302060131.KAA28694@etlken.m17n.org> References: <200302052331.IAA28568@etlken.m17n.org> <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044495084 27734 80.91.224.249 (6 Feb 2003 01:31:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gass-0007DA-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 02:31:22 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18gb1h-0000Uh-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 02:40:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gau1-0005RI-07 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 20:32:33 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gatW-00052P-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 20:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gatH-0004Kt-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 20:31:49 -0500 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gatA-000442-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 20:31:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2])h161VXk01804; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:31:33 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) h161VWR11349; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:31:32 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id KAA28694; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:31:32 +0900 (JST) Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:44:25 -0600 (CST)) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Original-cc: ted@oconnor.cx X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11400 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11400 In article <200302060044.SAA21429@eel.dms.auburn.edu>, Luc Teirlinck writes: > I now lean toward the original solution of using ?\s. I've just found that (eq 's '\s) => t. But, as (eq 'e '\e) is also t, this is not a problem, perhaps. > Alternatives like using 32, ?\040 or ?\x20 do not look attractive. To me the last two are attractive because we only have to change a manual to promote them instead of "? " or "?\ ". :-) --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org