From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ?\_ patch Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:31:45 +0900 (JST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302052331.IAA28568@etlken.m17n.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044487873 30601 80.91.224.249 (5 Feb 2003 23:31:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 23:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gZ0D-0007vt-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 00:30:49 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18gZ90-0007mR-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 00:39:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gZ27-0006oD-00 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gZ1P-00063X-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:32:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gZ1L-0005tk-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:31:59 -0500 Original-Received: from tsukuba.m17n.org ([192.47.44.130]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gZ1J-0005mO-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 18:31:57 -0500 Original-Received: from fs.m17n.org (fs.m17n.org [192.47.44.2])h15NVjk01093; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:31:45 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from etlken.m17n.org (etlken.m17n.org [192.47.44.125]) h15NVjR10824; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:31:45 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: (from handa@localhost) by etlken.m17n.org (8.8.8+Sun/3.7W-2001040620) id IAA28568; Thu, 6 Feb 2003 08:31:45 +0900 (JST) Original-To: ted@oconnor.cx In-reply-to: (ted@oconnor.cx) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2.92 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11396 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11396 In article , "Edward O'Connor" writes: > [1 ] > Since no one seemed to object and it's a trivial change, here's a > patch to add ?\_ support. Light testing here shows no ill effects. I object to it. By grepping, I found many files under lisp subdir are using "?\_" for representing "?_" (e.g. calc/calc-ext.el). Some are using ?\X unconditionaly even in the place where ?X works. That means there are much more such files not included in Emacs distribution. If we change the meaning of ?\_, all of them stop working. --- Ken'ichi HANDA handa@m17n.org