From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ruler-mode.el fix following whitespace cleanup Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:37:44 -0600 (CST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200302050037.SAA19430@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: <3E26CE2100B182E5@mel-rta6.wanadoo.fr> <200302042325.RAA19370@eel.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1044405370 25574 80.91.224.249 (5 Feb 2003 00:36:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 00:36:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: storm@cua.dk Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18gDXs-0006eL-00 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 01:36:08 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18gDgC-0002pP-00 for ; Wed, 05 Feb 2003 01:44:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gDZV-0006EW-05 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gDZ5-00064I-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:37:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gDYs-0005hW-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18gDYl-0005X9-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 19:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA28206; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:36:59 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id SAA19430; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 18:37:44 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu In-reply-to: <200302042325.RAA19370@eel.dms.auburn.edu> (message from Luc Teirlinck on Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:25:24 -0600 (CST)) Original-cc: lektu@terra.es Original-cc: David.Ponce@wanadoo.fr Original-cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11372 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11372 >>From my previous message: Never mind, now I understand. C-M-q and there we go. Yes, this is a real problem. After all no, if you use ;; does the doubling up not prevent reindentation? Which means that ?\ ;; should be safe (or not?). That might put the comment in an unconventional place, but it is obvious why it is where it is, anyway. But I like the ?\_ suggestion too. It would not only be clearer but help prevent all kinds of accidents with accidental tabification. Sincerely, Luc.