From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Luc Teirlinck Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: info Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:21:39 -0600 (CST) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <200301301621.KAA08744@eel.dms.auburn.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043944196 27585 80.91.224.249 (30 Jan 2003 16:29:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 16:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18eHZV-00079p-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:29:49 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18eHfE-0004e7-00 for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:35:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18eHYb-0004QM-0E for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:28:54 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18eHYD-0003w7-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:28:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18eHWI-0002Sk-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:26:34 -0500 Original-Received: from manatee.dms.auburn.edu ([131.204.53.104]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18eHR4-00073G-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eel.dms.auburn.edu (eel.dms.auburn.edu [131.204.53.108]) by manatee.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA06508; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:20:55 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: (from teirllm@localhost) by eel.dms.auburn.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id KAA08744; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:21:39 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: eel.dms.auburn.edu: teirllm set sender to teirllm@dms.auburn.edu using -f Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 10:21:25 -0500) Original-cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il Original-cc: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11225 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11225 Richard Stallman wrote: In this case, it would be good for RET to get an error. Probably it should take a single menu item to consist of the * line followed by all successive indented lines, including blank lines when further indented lines follow but excluding blank lines that would be at the end of the menu item. Problems occur in situations like: * Sample .emacs File:: --- Indices --- * Concept Index:: Put point on the `I' of indices. This does not seem part of the previous menu item, but it is indented (be it only slightly) and only separated from the menu item by blank lines. One can get around that by deleting the "including blank lines when further indented lines follow", which would yield Kai's algorithm, but you seem to suggest that there are instances where such lines should be included. Sincerely, Luc.